USPTO serial 86487128
ARIELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARIELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Strauss
GARY M ANDERSON FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DR10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, LPS, TAPE CASSETTES, AUDIO CASSETTES, AUDIO TAPES, AUDIO DISCS, RECORDS, CD-ROMS, VIDEO TAPES, VIDEO CASSETTES, VIDEO DISCS, DVDS, DATS, MP3S, AND LASER DISCS ALL FEATURING MUSIC; AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING MUSIC AND ARTISTIC PERFORMANCES; DIGITAL MUSIC DOWNLOADABLE VIA THE INTERNET AND WIRELESS DEVICES; DOWNLOADABLE MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS AND VIDEO RECORDINGS | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2009 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCES; MUSIC VIDEO PRODUCTION; PRODUCTION OF SOUND AND MUSIC VIDEO RECORDINGS; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING NON-DOWNLOADABLE VIDEOS IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; PROVIDING ON-LINE VIDEOS FEATURING MUSIC, NOT DOWNLOADABLE | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2017 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |