Drawing for ROCK THE BELLS MUSIC GROUP

USPTO serial 86488672

ROCK THE BELLS MUSIC GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCK THE BELLS MUSIC GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

Jill M. Pietrini SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer storage devices, namely, flash drives sold blank and with pre-recorded content featuring music; digital media, namely, pre-recorded DVDs and CDs, downloadable audio recordings, and downloadable video recordings, all featuring music or performances by musicians; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books, booklets, magazines, journals, brochures, pamphlets and newsletters, all in the field of music; electronic game programs; eyewear; eyewear cases; headphones; earphones; musical sound recordings; musical video recordingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2020EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 30, 2020EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 30, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 17, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2020EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2020EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 4, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 11, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 11, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 4, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 16, 2019EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2019EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 19, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 19, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2018NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2018NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2017CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 3, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 27, 2017CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2017MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 10, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 10, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 11, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 7, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 21, 2016CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 21, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2016ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2016MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2015CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 28, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 16, 2015ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2015MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2015AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2015PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance