USPTO serial 86488895
DELTADNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2016
- Examiner
- HSU, FONG
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DELTADNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,446*
Plus Government fees of $3,400
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BRIGHTON, GB
Balerno, Midlothian, GB
Balerno, Midlothian, GB
Balerno, Midlothian, GB
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
John M. Kim IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for online gaming and online gaming analytics and marketing; computer programmes for online gaming and online gaming analytics and marketing; computer analytics software for online gaming and online gaming analytics and marketing; computer software platform to allow the further development of other computer software applications; computer software to enable searching of data; electronic databases in the field of online gaming and online gaming analytics and marketing recorded on computer media; computer databases in the field of online gaming and online gaming analytics and marketing recorded on computer media | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2014 |
| 035 | Marketing services; business management and organization consultancy services; marketing advice and consultancy services; provision of marketing data, information and analytics; technical advisory services relating to data processing; business development services; computerized analysis of marketing performance of online games data; marketing services in relation to online computer gaming analytics and computer software applications; technical data analysis services relating to marketing performance of online games | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2011 |
| 041 | [ Providing online computer games; ] online computer gaming analytics; online computer gaming analytics for entertainment purposes; providing online information in the field of computer gaming; provision of information relating to entertainment online from a computer database on the Internet; provision of personalized entertainment services in the nature of online computer gaming and online computer gaming analytics; analytic services relating to computer gameplay; technical data analysis services relating to online games; computerized analysis of online games data | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2014 |
| 042 | Analytic services relating to computers; analytic services relating to computer programmes; computer game integration; software development; software development services; product development; product development consultation; product research and development; website development services; database development services; computer services, namely, designing, managing and monitoring of computer software for online forums; electronic data storage; data mining; maintenance of computer software; analysis and research services in relation to computer software | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITY SOFTWARE LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DELTADNA Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DELTADNA Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DELTADNA Limited
- Other trademarks owned by UNITY TECHNOLOGIES SF
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DELTADNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 18, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 1, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |