Drawing for Serial No. 86489300

USPTO serial 86489300

Serial No. 86489300

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 86489300?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pasquale A. Razzano

Pasquale A. Razzano VENABLE LLP1290 Avenue of the Americas, 20th Fl.New York, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020non-metal money boxes; non-metal decorative plaques of plastic; non-metal name plaques of plasticACTIVEJan 31, 2015

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2019CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2019SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 15, 2019IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 15, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2019EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 26, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 25, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 19, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 19, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 18, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 18, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 19, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 19, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2016NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2016NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 21, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 1, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 31, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance