USPTO serial 86489677
DIAMOND RADIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIAMOND RADIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esquire
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, Esquire THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1827 POWERS FERRY RD SE BLDG 6ATLANTA, GA 30339-5687UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics | ACTIVE | Apr 29, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2016 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |