USPTO serial 86489705
MEDSKL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2020
- Examiner
- LIEBL, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 704 applies to Madrid Protocol extensions of protection in the U.S. Section 71 (similar to Section 8) showing continued use was accepted. The U.S. extension remains active. Follow Madrid and USPTO deadlines for the next renewal cycle.
Need help with MEDSKL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice Housey
Janice Housey Litmus Law PLLC4 Weems Ln #240Winchester, VA 22601United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded informational videos featuring medical topics and informational diagnostic tests and algorithms upon which they are based; video recordings featuring the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of clinical presentations of medical conditions; data recordings in the nature of audio recordings, animations, video and voice-over slide presentations containing information related to healthcare and medicine | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Online educational testing services regarding medical topics; training and seminars in the field of scientific knowledge dissemination with regard to medical topics; training and seminars in the field of medical knowledge dissemination | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | [ Consulting in the field of medical knowledge dissemination; Providing medical information on a variety of medical topics via a variety of media, namely, audio, video, internet, broadband, phone, and wireless; Providing medical information on a variety of topics to medical providers via a variety of media, namely, audio, video, internet, broadband, phone, and wireless ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cost Effective Healthcare Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MEDSKL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 18, 2026 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |