USPTO serial 86490173
PAMELA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAMELA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Principe
DAVID L. PRINCIPE PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP125 MAIN ST STE 800BUFFALO, NY 14203-2887UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials, namely, manuals, pamphlets, booklets, books, magazines, posters and guides in the field of computer and video games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | toys, namely, bath toys, board games, toy boxes, card games, dolls, plush toys, stuffed toys, toy action figures and accessories therefor, collectible toy figures, crib toys, disc toss toys, doll clothing, doll playsets, electric action toys, mechanical toys, teddy bears, toy mobiles, toy vehicles, toy cars, toy model kits, toy trucks, toy watches, wind-up toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 24, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |