USPTO serial 86490287
THERMAL TECH WOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2017
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with THERMAL TECH WOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, CA
Montreal QC H1Z 4J5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Pieroni
Lisa A. Pieroni Kirschstein, Israel, Schiffmiller & Pieroni, P.C.66 Palmer AvenueSuite 49BBronxville, NY 10708Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Wool coats and jackets | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 8, 2024 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 15, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 16, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |