USPTO serial 86490313
DIVX OHANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BHUPATHI, TARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVX OHANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
JOHN M KIM IP LEGAL ADVISORS PC4445 EASTGATE MALLSUITE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for collecting, viewing, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage, commenting on, and sharing of data and information; computer software for viewing, playing, downloading, transferring and sharing audio, video and other multimedia content among networked devices and devices that share a common communications protocol; and computer software for viewing, playing, downloading, transferring and sharing audio, video and other multimedia content to and among wireless devices; video encryption and decryption software; video encoding and decoding software; computer software for encoding, decoding, capturing, playing, viewing, downloading, transferring, commenting on, and sharing audio, video and other multimedia files; video encoding, decoding and transcoding software; digital rights management software; all of the foregoing in the field of creation, recording, secure distribution, sharing and playback of video content across a wide variety of devices including mobile and smart TVs | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for encryption, decryption, encoding, decoding, transcoding, capturing, playing, viewing, downloading, transferring, storing, sharing, commenting on, and distribution of audio, video and other multimedia files; providing a web site featuring temporary use of non-downloadable software for sending, receiving, storing, and managing encryption keys; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for storing, managing and delivering digital rights management licenses; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for authorizing and managing playback of audio, video and other multimedia files on consumer electronics devices; providing a website that gives users the ability to review various print, photographic, graphic image, and audio and video content and to provide input, likes, dislikes, edits, changes, modifications, opinions, suggestions, and comments and engage in social networking; all of the foregoing in the field of creation, recording, secure distribution, sharing and playback of video content across a wide variety of devices including mobile and smart TVs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |