Drawing for DELICE DE CHABLIS SELECTED BY WILL STUDD

USPTO serial 86490428

DELICE DE CHABLIS SELECTED BY WILL STUDD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DELICE DE CHABLIS SELECTED BY WILL STUDD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael S. Metteauer

MICHAEL S METTEAUER NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP98 SAN JACINTO BLVD SUITE 1100AUSTIN, TX 78701-4255UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheese, milk, milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt, butter, butter cream, creamABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 1, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 1, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 1, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 15, 2016OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 18, 2015ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2014NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance