USPTO serial 86491325
HAND-DAZZLE HAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAND-DAZZLE HAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberley Cunningham
Kimberley Cunningham Bennett Jones LLP3200 TELUS HOUSE, 10020 - 100 StreetEdmonton, AB, T5J0N3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | arts and craft kits for children featuring dolls, puppets and finger puppets, gloves and decorative accessories for dolls, puppets and finger puppets | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | hobby craft kits for accessorizing dolls, puppets and finger puppets comprising dolls, puppets and finger puppets, gloves and decorative accessories for dolls, puppets and finger puppets; children's multiple activity toys; dolls; hand and finger puppets; children's multiple activity toys and craft kits comprised of dolls, puppets, finger puppets and gloves and decorative toy accessories for puppets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |