USPTO serial 86491844
FAYAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAYAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bordeaux, FR
Bordeaux, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele S. Katz
MICHELE S. KATZ Advitam IP, LLC150 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2400Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on 44(e)) Common metals and their alloys; metal building materials, namely, composite panels composed primarily of metal; prefabricated buildings of metal; framework of metal for building; reinforcing materials of metal for building, namely, steel profiles, steel sheets; transportable buildings of metal; materials of metal for railway tracks; non-electric cables and wires of common metal; ironmongery, namely, bolts, metalwork, railings, stairs, bridge; small hardware of metal, namely, fixation bolts and screws, ironsmith devices, namely, anvils and slack tubs; Metal shelter structures; Non-luminous metal beacons; storage tanks of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | (Based on 44(e)) Machine tools for crushing rock; road making machines; machinery for the production of asphalt for road surfaces; asphalt mixers for road works; multifunctional machines for road paving, multifunctional machines for road maintenance, namely, sweepers; road base finishing machines; machine parts, namely, drum rollers for road paving; concrete mixer machines; bulldozers; drilling machines; cranes; Material handling machines, namely, palletizers, case elevators, automatic pallet dispensing machines and automatic slip sheet dispensing machines; beltconveyors; roller conveyors; railway construction machines, namely, machines for laying down track; machines, namely, gravel spreaders for road surfaces; machines for treating joints and cracks in road surface; Ironsmith devices, namely, power hammers | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | (Based on Intent to Use) Hand-operated ironsmith devices, namely, hammers, chisels, tongs, fullers, hardy tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | (Based on 44(e)) Non-metallic building materials, namely, concrete, waterproofing membranes for roofing, floors and walls, wood framework, finishes works, namely, wooden doors, tiles of ceramic for wall, floor or ceiling, non-metal false ceiling tiles, non-metal curtain walls; non-metallic transportable buildings; reinforcing materials, not of metal, for building, namely, concrete beams, precast wall, precast slabs, precast shafts, precast bathrooms; framework for building, not of metal, namely, wood door frames; non-metallic materials for coating roads, namely, Asphalt-based coatings and sealants; materials for making and coating roads, namely, asphalt, concrete, bitumen, tar, coatings of asphalt, and silica; binding materials for repairing roads, namely, cement; cement for furnaces; storage tanks of masonry | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | (Based on 44(e)) Lease financing of construction equipment; Lease financing of cleaning machines; Lease financing of road equipment; Lease financing of public works equipment; Lease financing of asphalt plants; hire purchase financing of gravel spreaders; Real estate affairs, namely, financing, investment and leasing of real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on 44(e)) Construction of buildings; construction consultation; repair of construction equipment; repair information in the field of construction equipment; installation, maintenance and repair of machines, construction equipment, cleaning machines, road equipment, public works equipment, asphalt plants, gravel spreaders; installation, maintenance and repair of electric apparatus in the nature of construction equipment; street cleaning; vehicle cleaning; vehicle breakdown assistance, namely, repair services; road paving; rental of construction tools and equipment; repair of rebuilding machines that have been worn or partially destroyed; rental of road equipment, public works equipment, roadwork machines, construction equipment, cleaning machines, asphalt plants, gravel spreaders; construction supervision of building works; demolition of buildings; Repair and building construction of real estate property | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FAYAT
- Other trademarks owned by FAYAT
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named FAYAT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 1, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |