Drawing for MISTER P

USPTO serial 86492349

MISTER P

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISTER P?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RYAN LEVY

RYAN LEVY Patterson Intellectual Property Law, PC1600 DIVISION ST, SUITE 500NASHVILLE, TN 37203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Fresh onions; raw onions; unprocessed onionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 26, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2018IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2018INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jun 4, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 26, 2018FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 26, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 1, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 10, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 6, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 2, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance