USPTO serial 86492359
EUCAFLUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2018
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with EUCAFLUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pituba, Salvador, Bahi, BR
Pituba, Salvador, Bahi, BR
Pituba, Salvador, Bahi, BR
SALVADOR, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart L. Gitler
Stewart L. Gitler WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC1451 Dolley Madison Blvd.Suite 210McLean, VA 22101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Semi-processed cellulose acetate for use in the absorbents industry, namely, for personal and animal hygiene, filter materials, wound treatment, incontinence, clothing parts, furniture parts, dental products and agricultural absorbents; foil of regenerated cellulose sheet, except for packaging; foil of regenerated cellulose layers, except for packaging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUZANO PAPEL E CELULOSE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SUZANO PAPEL E CELULOSE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SUZANO PAPEL E CELULOSE S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SUZANO S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named EUCAFLUFF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 15, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 27, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |