USPTO serial 86492649
LEVITATIONLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEVITATIONLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. O'Malley
JAMES A. O'MALLEY CLARK HILL PLC150 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60601-7576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Functional bedding and bedding accessories, namely, mattress encasements, mattress covers, box spring covers, platform covers, foundation covers, adjustable foundation covers, mattresses, mattress supports, bed skirts, and built-in panels for platforms, foundations, adjustable foundations; Devices used to facilitate the maneuvering of mattresses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services in the fields of bedding technology, functional bedding and bedding accessories; Retail store services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the fields of bedding technology, functional bedding and bedding accessories; Retail store services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users in the fields of bedding technology, functional bedding and bedding accessories; Retail store services through direct solicitation by salespersons directed to end-users in the fields of bedding technology, functional bedding and bedding accessories; Maintenance of functional bedding and bedding accessories; Repair of functional bedding and bedding accessories; Custom design of functional bedding and bedding accessories; Custom engineering of functional bedding and bedding accessories; Industrial research in the fields of bedding technology, functional bedding and bedding accessories; and Product development in the fields of bedding technology, functional bedding and bedding accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |