USPTO serial 86493327
EXPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GROVEPORT, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONNA S. TWEEL
DONNA S TWEEL DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP1 S MAIN ST STE 1300DAYTON, OH 45402-2058UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PC Tablets; PC batteries; battery chargers; battery chargers for use with mobile telephones; cell phone battery chargers; cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; personal computer battery chargers; MP3 players; device driver software for PC tablets, PC batteries, chargers and MP3 players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |