Drawing for GREENPRO

USPTO serial 86493538

GREENPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BODRI, JOHN PETER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Liel Hollander

LIEL HOLLANDER HOLLANDER LAW, P.C.10 BOND ST STE 420GREAT NECK, NY 11021-2454UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Fruit and vegetable slicers; Non-electric fruit and vegetable peelersACTIVE—
009Smart phone and tablet accessories, namely, battery chargers, cases, protective cases, carrying cases, connection cables, screen protectors; Camera accessories, namely, battery chargers, cases, protective cases, carrying cases, connection cables, tripodsACTIVE—
020Bed and Furniture Risers comprised of individual non-metal supports for placement under the bed or furniture to raise the height of the bed or furniture; Clothes hangers; Pillows, non-metal bins; serving bar cartACTIVE—
021Plastic Cups; ice ball molds; Drinking straws; Containers for household use; storage container for plastic bags; bowls; silicone molds for ice pops; Bread bins; ice pop makers, namely, ice pop forms; Garlic presses; Laundry hampers for domestic or household use; Refuse binsACTIVE—
022Laundry bags; bra and lingerie laundry wash bagACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 28, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 30, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 10, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 14, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 13, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance