USPTO serial 86493735
INTELLIGENCE OF THINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENCE OF THINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Flextronics International Ltd.
Singapore 486123, SG
SINGAPORE, SG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
PAMELA N HIRSCHMAN SHERIDAN ROSS PC1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Custom manufacture of electronics, power supplies, lighting and computer goods for others; technical support services, namely providing technical advice related to the manufacture of electronics, power supplies, lighting and computer goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering services, consulting services in the field of new product development in the fields of electronics, power supplies, lighting and computers; new product design services; research and development of new products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2020 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 20, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 30, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |