USPTO serial 86495471
IMAGINE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2018
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 701 means the registration is active and the first Section 8 declaration of continued use was accepted. The next major deadline is the combined Section 8 and Section 9 filing at the 10-year anniversary. Calendar the 10-year Section 8 and 9 combined renewal.
Need help with IMAGINE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
Rhinebeck, NY
Other trademarks owned by Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
Rhinebeck, NY
Other trademarks owned by Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
Rhinebeck, NY
Other trademarks owned by Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
BARTRAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC
LAS VEGAS, NV
Other trademarks owned by BARTRAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | designing computer networks consisting of telecommunication backbone services, and designing computer databases of information for others contained in file servers for access via interconnected computer networks linked by common protocols; providing consultation services in the field of website development, computer network design, and computer systems design; design of telecommunications systems, namely, wireless cellular, small cell, and wireless communication networks [, IP-based video-security and wireless networks, IP-based digital signage networks, Voice-over-IP(VoIP) based voice networks, Radio-over-IP (RoIP) based radio networks, Internet-of-Things (IoT) IP device networks, line-of-site laser and microwave communications systems, satellite teleport and terrestrial network gateways and interconnection systems ]; design of telecommunications systems, namely, designing cellular backhaul networks, fiber optic-transport backhaul network architecture for wireless cellular and small cell networks; designing telecommunications backbone interconnection systems for wireless cellular and small cell networks; designing Internet routing network architecture for wireless cellular and small cell networks, cellular and small cell fiber-optic-transport backhaul networks; designing computer and telecommunications cybersecurity, security, and encryption solutions for wireless cellular, small cell, and wireless communication networks [, IP-based video-security and wireless networks, IP-based digital signage networks, Voice-over-IP (VoIP) based voice networks, Radio-over-IP (RoIP) based radio networks, Internet-of-Things (IoT) IP device networks, line-of-site laser and microwave communications systems, satellite teleport and terrestrial network gateways and interconnection systems ]; providing computer network consulting services in the field of wireless cellular, small cell, and wireless communication networks [, IP-based video-security and wireless networks, IP-based digital signage networks, Voice-over-IP (VoIP) based voice networks, Radio-over-IP (RoIP) based radio networks, Internet-of-Things (IoT) IP device networks, line-of-site laser and microwave communications systems, satellite teleport and terrestrial network gateways and interconnection systems ]; providing computer consulting services and Internet routing network architecture for cellular backhaul networks, fiber-optic-transport backhaul network architecture for wireless cellular and small cell networks; providing computer network consulting services for cybersecurity, security, and encryption solutions for wireless cellular, small cell, and wireless communication networks, IP-based video-security and wireless networks [, IP-based digital signage networks, Voice-over-IP (VoIP) based voice networks, Radio-over-IP (RoIP) based radio networks, Internet-of-Things (IoT) IP device networks, line-of-site laser and microwave communications systems, satellite teleport and terrestrial network gateways and interconnection systems ]; providing pro-bono wireless computer networking consulting services for public libraries and not-for-profit organizations; [ designing undersea fiber-optic submarine telecommunication networks to connect to terrestrial fiber-optic telecommunication networks, fiber-optic based wireless backhaul networks for wireless cellular and small cell networks, satellite teleport and terrestrial network gateways; ] computer services for others, namely, programming, design and development of computer networks; computer and server hardware design and development; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of computer hardware and software applications systems of others; [ computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; data automation services using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data; providing a web hosting platform for end customers' computing infrastructure; computer services, namely, remote and onsite management of the information technology systems of others; ] technical support services, namely, troubleshooting and resolution of customers' computer hardware and software problems; information technology consulting services; consulting in the field of computer and network virtualization technologies for commercial enterprises and businesses, higher educational institutions, national laboratories, government agencies, and military services; [ consulting in the field of computer and network behavioral analysis software and hardware technologies for commercial enterprises and businesses, higher educational institutions, national laboratories, government agencies, and military services; ] computer and network security and information assurance consulting services; [ computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; ] design of computer databases; [ technical support services, namely, remote administration and management of in-house and hosted datacenter devices, databases and software applications; ] data migration services; [ computer disaster recovery planning services; ] consulting in the field of cloud computing services; computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of cloud computing systems and applications for others; cloud computing featuring software for cloud storage and network management, [ cloud hardware management, ] cloud software defined network management, cloud management of cloud based telephone VoIP voicemail, [ cloud call centers for others; ] cloud computer technical monitoring and reporting, cloud computer software design and software architecture maintenance; providing online virtual computer networks and virtual computer network environments for others through cloud computing that enables users to share data; design and development of web sites for third parties [ ; computer consulting, namely, designing individual specialized trusted Internet commons networks for a national commons network; computer consulting, namely, designing an encompassing cohesive national commons computer network architecture for protecting critical national infrastructure in democratic nation-states and interoperability and/or intercommunication between individual specialized trusted Internet commons networks yielding maximum agility, adaptability, flexibility, innovation, and scalability with core standard and specialized Commons-IP protocols and individual Commons-IP registered security and identity management systems; computer consulting, namely, designing carrier-grade and military-grade democratic nation-state cyberborders for national cyber defense, Internet commons network defense, and defense-in-depth ] | ACTIVE | May 18, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Imagine.com Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BARTRAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IMAGINE NETWORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2025 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 13, 2024 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2023 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | CCON | COUNTERCLAIM OPP. NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |