USPTO serial 86495515
MAXIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE-RICHARDSON HA, BRITTANY NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara Lipshutz
BARBARA LIPSHUTZ Jacobs & Burleigh Llp1290 Avenue of the Americas30th FloorNew York, NY 10104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game programs and computer game software, including software downloadable from the internet; mobile applications for amusement and entertainment services, namely, software for use in playing casino games and other games of chance on cell phones, tablets and other handheld devices; mobile applications for amusement and entertainment services, namely, software for use in playing fantasy sports on cell phones, tablets and other handheld devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online casino gambling services and providing online computer games; providing online non-downloadable computer games in the nature of virtual slot machines and other games of chance; providing online casino video games including slot machines, blackjack and poker games; providing online computer games of chance distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media, including telephony, mobile or handheld devices, or provided online from a computer database or via the Internet; entertainment services in the nature of fantasy sports leagues and fantasy sports league play | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |