USPTO serial 86495732
ALCHEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALCHEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin C. Johnson
BENJAMIN C. JOHNSON BOESCH LAW GROUP225 SANTA MONICA BLVD FL 11SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-2221UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded digital video discs featuring motion pictures and television series in the fields of music, comedy, drama, action, adventure, and/or animation; Pre-recorded DVDs featuring motion pictures and television series in the fields of music, comedy, drama, action, adventure, and/or animation; Pre-recorded optical storage discs featuring motion pictures and television series in the fields of music, comedy, drama, action, adventure, and/or animation | ACTIVE | Feb 6, 2015 |
| 041 | Distribution of television shows and movies | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |