Drawing for SOUNDASLEEP PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 86495883

SOUNDASLEEP PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EISNACH, MICHAEL PATRICK
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOUNDASLEEP PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene Bolmarcich

GENE BOLMARCICH LAW OFFICES OF GENE BOLMARCICH215 STERLING DRIVENEWINGTON, CT 06111-2261UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Portable, inflatable, air mattresses for home useACTIVEMay 22, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 9, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 28, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 2, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 18, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 28, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 28, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 27, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 27, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2015MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance