Drawing for "I'M WOK'EN HEAR"

USPTO serial 86496493

"I'M WOK'EN HEAR"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "I'M WOK'EN HEAR"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew D. Francis

Matthew D. Francis Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP5371 Kietzke LnReno, NV 89511-2083UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Flashing LED safety lights incorporated into hook and loop fasteners for providing visibility for people, pets, and cyclistsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2018COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2018AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 10, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2018EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2018EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 9, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 9, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2015GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 17, 2015GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 17, 2015CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 12, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance