USPTO serial 86499306
ZPVTNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZPVTNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Johannesburg, ZA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell phones; Portable telephones; Smartphones; Telephone apparatus; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Wireless headsets for mobile phones and tablet computers; Cameras; Digital cameras; Video cameras; Two-way radios; Mobile and Wearable Devices for wireless radio transmission; Rugged cell phones, namely, cell phones having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged smart phones, namely, smart phones having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged cameras, namely, cameras having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions;Rugged video cameras, namely, video cameras having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged two-way radios namely, two-way radios having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged devices for wireless radio transmission, namely, devices for wireless radio transmission having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Cell phone cases; Carrying cases for cell phones; Protective covers and cases for cell phones; Cell phone cases, namely, cases specially designed to provide protection for the enclosed cell phone device in instances of natural disasters; Cell phone cases, namely, cases specially designed to provide protection for the enclosed cell phone device in instances of outer space exploration; Waterproof cases for handheld electronic devices, namely, cell phones, portable media players, tablet computers, and personal digital assistants | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |