USPTO serial 86500158
RUGTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUGTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Johannesburg, ZA
Johannesburg, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
Raj Abhyanker LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.446 E Southern AveTempe, AZ 85282UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell phones; Portable telephones; Smartphones; Telephone apparatus; Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; Wireless headsets for mobile phones and tablet computers; Cameras; Digital cameras; Video cameras; Two-way radios; Mobile and Wearable Devices for wireless radio transmission; Rugged cell phones, namely, cell phones having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged smart phones, namely, smart phones having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged cameras, namely, cameras having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions;Rugged video cameras, namely, video cameras having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged two-way radios namely, two-way radios having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Rugged devices for wireless radio transmission, namely, devices for wireless radio transmission having shock and vibration resistance, a water-resistant exterior, and being highly reliable in extreme temperature and weather conditions; Cell phone cases; Carrying cases for cell phones; Protective covers and cases for cell phones; Cell phone cases, namely, cases specially designed to provide protection for the enclosed cell phone device in instances of natural disasters; Cell phone cases, namely, cases specially designed to provide protection for the enclosed cell phone device in instances of outer space exploration; Waterproof cases for handheld electronic devices, namely, cell phones, portable media players, tablets, personal digital assistants, e-book reader | ABANDONED | Nov 29, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |