USPTO serial 86503030
MEDIABOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDIABOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brockville, Ont., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Smugler
66B GLYNN AVEOTTAWA, ON, K1K1S8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software that manages, monitors, measures and tracks the performance and effectiveness of advertising and promotion in various media; business monitoring and consulting services, namely, tracking the effectiveness of advertising, promotion and exposure in various media in order to provide strategy, insight, marketing and sales information and in order to provide a methodology for paying for such advertising, promotion and exposure; software as a service in the field of measurement of sales generated by media, by media promotion and by media exposure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 27, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |