USPTO serial 86504343
CHARGETECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHARGETECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip A. Kantor
Philip A. Kantor Law Offices of Philip A. Kantor, P.C.1781 Village Center Circle, Suite 120Las Vegas, NV 89134UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and downloadable software for use in monitoring, tracking, detecting, preventing and managing fraud in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing; card readers and card scanners for credit cards and debit cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing business information in the field of chargeback resolution and prevention, namely, providing business information to merchants to avoid chargebacks; Business assistance, advisory and consulting services in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention; providing business information in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention via a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Chargeback resolution and prevention services, namely, providing credit card financial risk management information to merchants to avoid chargebacks: chargeback resolution and prevention services in the nature of chargeback recovery services, namely, collection of revenue for merchants; Providing financial risk management services for credit card and debit card payment processing via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a website featuring technology that allows users to exchange information about potential credit card and debit card fraud; on-line non-downloadable software for use in monitoring, tracking, detecting, preventing and managing fraud in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Chargeback resolution and prevention services, namely, providing credit card fraud detection information to merchants to avoid chargebacks; legal services, namely, chargeback resolution and prevention services in the nature of representing merchants in chargeback disputes; Providing fraud detection services in the field of credit cards and debit cards; computerized fraud monitoring and detection in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing; fraud detection services in the nature of evaluation of evidence relating to fraud in the field of credit card and debit card payment processing; fraud management and risk management consultation services, namely, providing credit card and debit card security threat information and analysis to retailers by electronic means; computerized security services in the field of credit cards and debit cards, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other suspicious activity; legal consulting services in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention; providing an interactive website allowing users to exchange information about potential credit card and debit card fraud; social networking services in the field of credit card and debit card fraud detection and prevention and credit card and debit card payment processing, provided via a website; membership-based fraud detection and prevention services, namely, providing members of a membership program with information on suspicious and abnormal patterns of point of sale activity indicating theft, fraud, or other suspicious activity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ChargeTech, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ChargeTech, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named CHARGETECH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |