USPTO serial 86504621
Z5 MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Z5 MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Clearwater, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Matthew Marquardt, Esq.
J. MATTHEW MARQUARDT, ESQ. MACFARLANE FERGUSON & MCMULLEN, P.A.625 COURT ST STE 200CLEARWATER, FL 33756-5528UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, which runs on an all-in-one desktop computer, which is a software video phone and accessories therefor for deaf and hearing-impaired persons to allow deaf and hearing-impaired persons to call each other as well as to allow deaf and hearing-impaired persons to call hearing people utilizing Video Relay Service through an American Sign Language interpreter, and user documentation sold as a unit with the goods | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2016 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |