Drawing for VGS

USPTO serial 86504902

VGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRENNAN, KEVIN GERARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

DANIEL E KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN S C1000 N WATER ST STE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear, namely, hiking boots, contractor boots, military boots, and law enforcement uniform and service boots, all featuring shock absorbing technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 9, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 9, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 9, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 9, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 9, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance