USPTO serial 86505423
WINDMILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINDMILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Seochogu Seoul 137-858, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo P C701 Pennsylvania Ave NW Ste 900Washington, DC 20004-2608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer program; Computer software; Computer program recorded; Computer software recorded; Computer operating programs, recorded; Software for processing image/graphic/text; Computer software (Computer Software for digital broadcasting) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Information retrieval services on the internet for others; Compilation of information into computer databases; Systemization of information into computer databases; Management and compilation of computerized databases; Data search in computer files for others; Computerized file management; Compilation of statistics; Providing statistics information relating to economic and commercial; Providing statistics information relating to advertising effect; Providing statistics information for business and commercial; Systemization of information into computer databases(Systemization of databases for digital broadcasting); Commercial intermediary services in the field of computer | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Rental of a database server (to third parties); Development of data processing programs; Developing of driver and operating system software; Programming of multimedia applications; Conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; Development of computer programmes; Computer hardware development; Design of computer hardware; Development of computer programmes (Development of computer programmes for digital broadcasting) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |