Drawing for Serial No. 86506114

USPTO serial 86506114

Serial No. 86506114

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86506114?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Coery A. Donaldson

COREY A. DONALDSON KOPPEL PATRICK HEYBL & PHILPOTT2815 TOWNSGATE RD STE 215WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361-5827UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020neck pillowsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 17, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2015AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2015IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2015EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance