Drawing for WHATSAPPENING

USPTO serial 86507492

WHATSAPPENING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AIKENS, RONALD E
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WHATSAPPENING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gene Bolmarcich

GENE BOLMARCICH LAW OFFICES OF GENE BOLMARCICH215 STERLING DRNEWINGTON, CT 06111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software to provide users with information about cultural, entertainment, dining and transportation options based on user's locationABANDONED—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use to provide users with information about cultural, entertainment, dining and transportation options based on the user's locationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2016MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 14, 2016ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 14, 2016OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2016OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 19, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 19, 2015OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 20, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 30, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 29, 2015LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 18, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 14, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 22, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance