USPTO serial 86508598
HT MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MAXIMALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4862232Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 1, 2015
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HT MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MAXIMALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Megan K. Bowen
Megan K. Bowen Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP1111 Pennsylvania Avenue , NWAttn: TMSUWashington, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Petroleum based fluids, namely, brake fluid, drill mud fluids; fluid for use in lubrication of drive train components, namely, transmissions, axles, gear boxes, final driver, differentials and u-joints; hydraulic fluids, heat transfer fluid for industrial use, transformer fluid for heat transfer in industrial transformers; transmission fluid; petroleum based industrial fluids used to flush and clean heat transfer systems and compressors; Additives, namely, chemical fuel additives; transmission oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2013 |
| 004 | Lubricating oils and greases, namely, industrial oils and greases, synthetic oil and greases, 2-cycle engine oil, antimicrobial preparations sold as an integral component of food grade lubricating oils and greases, base oil, chain oil, circulating oils, compressor oil, cutting oil, and metal working oils; industrial oil, namely, oil based electrical insulating fluid and transformer oil; lubricating oils and greases, namely, food grade lubricants; gear oil; industrial oils, namely, heat transfer oil, hydraulic oil; lubricating oils and greases, namely, motor oil, outboard motor oil, paper processing machine oil, penetrating oil, petroleum based coating agent for coating concrete forms; process extender oils for industrial use; refrigeration oils for industrial use; lubricating oils and greases, namely, rubber lubricants, saw guide lubricating oil, turbine oil, white mineral oil, wire and rope lubricants, and vacuum pump oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Suncor Energy Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Suncor Energy Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Suncor Energy Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named HT MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MAXIMALE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |