Drawing for SCOREAPPROVE

USPTO serial 86510131

SCOREAPPROVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOREAPPROVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ted D. Karr

TED D. KARR BERKELEY LAW & TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLP17933 NW EVERGREEN PWKY SUITE 250BEAVERTON, OR 97006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Mortgage and financing pre-qualification services, namely, buyer pre-qualification of financing for mortgage brokers, banks, real estate agents and real estate brokersACTIVE—
042Providing a website featuring online non-downloadable software, that enables consumers to determine affordability and rates and financing and borrowing capacity for an auto loan, personal loan, business loan, or credit cardACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 12, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 19, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 24, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 4, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 18, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 2, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance