USPTO serial 86511313
BEAUTIFULLY BROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAUTIFULLY BROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard B. Biagi
Richard B. Biagi Neal & McDevitt, LLC1776 Ash StreetNorthfield, IL 60093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books, newsletters, brochures, and magazines in the field of fashion, beauty, lifestyles, and topics of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | (Based on Use) Online journals, namely, blogs featuring beauty content for multicultural women, African American women, and women of color; Providing non-downloadable electronic publications, namely, blogs, in the fields of beauty, style, lifestyle, and self image of African American women, multicultural women, and women of color; (Based on Intent to Use) Entertainment and educational services, namely, exhibitions and workshops, in the fields of fashion, beauty, and lifestyles | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2014 |
| 044 | Providing news and information in the field of personal beauty; Providing information by way of the internet in the field of beauty and hair styling, in the form of photographic, audio, and video presentations | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2016 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | LOPR | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |