USPTO serial 86511483
AIRSPEED EDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRSPEED EDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Wasnofski, Jr.
ROBERT M. WASNOFSKI, JR. Dorsey & Whitney Llp51 W 52nd StNew York, NY 10019-6119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Plastic packaging materials, namely, inflatable plastic film for wrapping and packaging, plastic bags for merchandise packaging in the nature of envelopes and pouches, plastic bags for packaging, plastic film for wrapping and packaging, and air-bubble materials, namely, plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Packaging materials, namely, padding made of plastic for shipping containers, plastic film for packing purposes, plastic film for industrial and commercial packing use, padding for impact protection, comfort and fit, composed of bonded microspheres used in industry; packing cushioning materials of plastic for filling voids in packaging containers; pillow-like packing cushioning materials of plastic | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pregis Innovative Packaging LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pregis Innovative Packaging LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named AIRSPEED EDGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2018 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2018 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 3, 2018 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2018 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| May 8, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |