USPTO serial 86512006
INABA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4884343Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2016
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INABA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shauna M. Wertheim
Shauna M. Wertheim The Marbury Law Group Pllc11800 Sunrise Valley Drive15th FloorReston, VA 20191-5300Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | canned cooked meat; canned fisheries products, namely, canned tuna, canned bonito, canned sardines, canned scallops, and canned firefly squid; canned vegetables; canned soybeans; pre-cooked curry, namely, pre-cooked chicken curry, pre-cooked beef curry, pre-cooked pork curry, pre-cooked vegetable curry, and pre-cooked tuna curry; curry mixes, namely, instant or finished curry mixes that contain meat, fish and/or vegetables; soup mixes | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | pet food; dog food; cat food | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Inaba Shokuhin Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Inaba Shokuhin Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Inaba Shokuhin Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named INABA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2022 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |