Drawing for SHAREMAIL

USPTO serial 86512958

SHAREMAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHIANG, TIFFANY YOUNG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHAREMAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter A. Chiabotti

PETER A CHIABOTTI AKERMAN LLPPO BOX 3188WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for digitizing physical documents for routing the digitized document to the necessary recipients or workflow process; software for capturing metadata from digitized documents for use in connection with routing the digitized document to the necessary recipients or workflow process; software for integrating digitized documents and metadata from digitized documents with unified messaging systems for use in connection with routing the digitized document to the necessary recipients or workflow process; software for delivering digitized documents and metadata from digitized documents to unified messaging systems for routing to the necessary recipients or workflow processACTIVE—
042Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for digitizing physical documents for routing the digitized document to the necessary recipients or workflow process; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for capturing metadata from digitized documents for use in connection with routing the digitized document to the necessary recipients or workflow process; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for integrating digitized documents and metadata from digitized documents with unified messaging systems for use in connection with routing the digitized document to the necessary recipients or workflow process; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for delivering digitized documents and metadata from digitized documents to unified messaging systems for routing to the necessary recipients or workflow processACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 11, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 20, 2016RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Jun 20, 2016RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2016RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Jun 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 23, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 23, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 23, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 23, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 23, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2015MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance