Drawing for CLARK DOOR

USPTO serial 86513686

CLARK DOOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODWIN, KATRINA JOYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLARK DOOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J Maier

TIMOTHY J MAIER MAIER & MAIER PLLC345 SOUTH PATRICK STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Acoustical insulation barrier panels; Soundproofing materials; Soundproofing materials for buildingsACTIVE—
019Door casings, not of metal; Door frames, not of metal; Door jambs not of metal; Door panels, not of metal; Fire doors, not of metal; Non-metal door frames; Non-metal door panels; Non-metal doors; Safety doors, not of metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 23, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 3, 2017EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Oct 28, 2016GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2016CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 16, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 23, 2016GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2016EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2016JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 18, 2016EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2016ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2015RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Dec 8, 2015RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2015RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 18, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance