USPTO serial 86514467
PUTTING IOT TO WORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAW, CHRISTOPHER M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUTTING IOT TO WORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
DEBORAH J. PECKHAM BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER ST STE 800BOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable publications, namely, technical standards, brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, white papers, implementation guides, and manuals in the fields of voluntary standards for interoperability of complex machines, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems and mobile devices and the interoperability and integration of complex machinery, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems, mobile devices with networked sensors and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Publications, namely, technical standards, brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, white papers, implementation guides, and manuals in the fields of voluntary standards for interoperability of complex machines, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems and mobile devices and the interoperability and integration of complex machinery, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems, mobile devices with networked sensors and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of machinery, complex machinery and computer, internet and mobile device suppliers and the computer software development industry in the fields of voluntary standards for interoperability of complex machines, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems and mobile devices and the interoperability and integration of complex machinery, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems, mobile devices with networked sensors and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, development of software protocols and standards in the fields of interoperability of complex machines, information technology, connected machines, enterprise systems and mobile devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 15, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |