Drawing for FRESCA BY REINA CERVEZA SUAVE PREMIUM QUALITY IMPORTED FROM SPAIN

USPTO serial 86515376

FRESCA BY REINA CERVEZA SUAVE PREMIUM QUALITY IMPORTED FROM SPAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESCA BY REINA CERVEZA SUAVE PREMIUM QUALITY IMPORTED FROM SPAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carlynn Davis; Dermot Horgan; Jeannine Rittenhouse; Sean Swidler; Dan Lano; Jing Zhang; Dmitriy Makarov; Michael Kenaga; Amanda Peluse; Angela Kalsi

CARLYNN DAVIS; DERMOT HORGAN; JEANNINE RITTENHOUSE Iphorgan Ltd195 N Arlington Heights Rd Ste 125Buffalo Grove, IL 60089-1751UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beers, non-alcoholic beers, beer-based cocktails, flavoured beers, shandyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 29, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 28, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 11, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 28, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 26, 2015GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 26, 2015EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
May 26, 2015CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2015MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance