USPTO serial 86515930
INDIGENOUS PEOPLE SURVIVAL FOUNDATION (IPSF)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4953829Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 10, 2016
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INDIGENOUS PEOPLE SURVIVAL FOUNDATION (IPSF)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Valley City, UT
West Valley City, UT
West Valley City, UT
West Valley City, UT
West Valley City, UT
West Valley City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fundraising services in the US and internationally to provide charitable services related to food, health, and education | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MALIK, SHER
- Other trademarks owned by MALIK, SHER
- Other trademarks owned by MALIK, SHER
- Other trademarks owned by Malik, Saad
- Other trademarks owned by Malik, Saad
- Other trademarks owned by Malik, Saad
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named INDIGENOUS PEOPLE SURVIVAL FOUNDATION (IPSF)
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 10, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |