Drawing for FREEDOM REELS

USPTO serial 86515998

FREEDOM REELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEDOM REELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LINDA MARIE NORCROSS

LINDA MARIE NORCROSS Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.7230 AMIGO STREETLAS VEGAS, NV 89119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028gaming devices, namely, gaming machines, bingo machines, with or without video outputACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 6, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 25, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2017IULNITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Apr 6, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 30, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 20, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance