USPTO serial 86516200
UPET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UPET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Envigado, Antioquia, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curt Handley,
CURT HANDLEY, Law Office Of Curt Handley19540 Buckingham Dr Ste 1Mokena, IL 60448-2432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control and alarm monitoring systems; Automated process control system, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery, namely, turbines, generators and compressors; Automated systems, namely, software, hardware and communications devices for planning, scheduling, controlling, monitoring and providing information on transportation assets and parts thereof; Automatic combustion control machines and instruments; Automatic liquid-flow control machines and instruments; Automatic pressure control machines and instruments; Climate control systems consisting of digital thermostats, air conditioning, heating, ventilation and drying control devices; Computer controls for the operation of machine tools; Cruise controls for motor vehicles; Digital signage; Electric control panels; Electrical controlling devices; Electronic advertisement boards featuring a neon lamp; Electronic and magnetic ID cards for use in connection with payment for services; Electronic anti-theft system comprised of a bar code scanner that allows manufacturers to temporarily disable electronic goods during the manufacturing process and allows retailers to enable such goods upon receiving the purchase price for the goods; Electronic apparatus for the remote control of industrial operations; Electronic apparatus, namely, electronic display boards, plasma display boards, electronic display screens; Electronic apparatus, namely, motion detectors; Electronic apparatus, namely, plasma display panels; Electronic circuit board; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; Electronic computers; Electronic control systems for machines; Electronic data processing apparatus; Electronic devices for reading, encoding and programming transponder keys; Electronic display interfaces; Electronic door alarms; Electronic key cards; Electronic LCD advertisement display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities; Electronic LCD display unit with multi-networking (TCP/IP) capabilities; Electronic LED signs; Electronic locks; Electronic motion sensitive switches; Electronic notice boards; Electronic personal identification number (PIN) pads; Electronic proximity sensors and switches; Electronic readers and controllers for controlling access to a premises; Electronic readers/recorders for medical patient identification bands; Electronic scoreboards; Electronic security token in the nature of a fob-like device used by an authorized user of a computer system facilitate authentication; Electronic signs; Electronic switchers for audio and video signals; Electronic touch sensitive switches; Electronic warning bells; Electronic warning horn; Electronically encoded badges and swipe cards for use with time clocks; GPS navigation device; Infrared detectors for use in military, law enforcement, civil, scientific and industrial applications; Ionization apparatus for scientific or laboratory use; Power supplies; Protective rescue apparatus, namely, fire-resistant protective enclosures; Rescue apparatus, namely, surf rescue boards; Rescue flares; Rescue sleds; Scientific apparatus, namely, sensing and signaling devices for measurement and quality control of materials processing by laser; Scientific instrumentation for measuring weight, density, and size; Scientific measuring instruments, namely, conductivity meters; Self-rescue apparatus, namely, oxygen breathing units; Self-rescue apparatus, namely, respiratory gas containers; Sensor chips for scientific use; System boards (mother cards) and processors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |