USPTO serial 86516356
THE PROTEIN PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CALLAGHAN, BRIAN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PROTEIN PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SURFERS PARADISE QLD, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Hiney,
JESSICA HINEY, Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto1290 Avenue Of The Americas Fl 17New York, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring clothes, foodstuffs, blended beverages, smoothies, and juices; On-line retail store services featuring clothes, foodstuffs, blended beverages, smoothies, and juices; retail services, namely, automated vending machine services featuring foodstuffs, blended beverages, smoothies, and juices | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Arranging for the provision of food, namely, making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals; Hospitality services, namely, providing food and drinks; Preparation of food and drink; Preparation of take-away and fast food; Providing food and drink; Restaurant services for the provision of fast food; Snack bars for the provision of food and drink; Take-out restaurant services; Arranging for the provision of drink, namely, making reservations and bookings for bars; Restaurant services; Salad bar restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |