USPTO serial 86516958
EMERALD NECKLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2017
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EMERALD NECKLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*
Plus Government fees of $1,950
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
Cleveland, OH, US
Other trademarks owned by Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
Cleveland, OH, US
Other trademarks owned by Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
Cleveland, OH, US
Other trademarks owned by Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katie M. McVoy
4101 Fulton ParkwayCleveland, OH 44144United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed materials, namely, stickers, decals; printed brochures and newsletters in the field of recreational park services, zoo services, conservation services, and planned giving relating thereto; crayons made of natural materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Beverage glassware, mugs, tumblers, for use as drinking glasses, insulated containers for beverages for domestic use; portable beverage coolers; cookware, namely, pots and pans | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 2015 |
| 025 | Shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, sweaters, sweatshirts, shorts, vests, coats, jackets, anoraks, wind-resistant jackets, bodysuits and body shirts, coveralls, gloves, mittens, pajamas, infant wear, footwear, headwear | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Park Commissioners for the Cleveland Metropolitan Park District
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named EMERALD NECKLACE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2017 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 22, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2015 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2015 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 5, 2015 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |