USPTO serial 86517396
MAC QUANTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAC QUANTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beverly Shin
FARAH P BHATTI BUCHALTER NEMER18400 VON KARMAN AVESUITE 800IRVINE, CA 92612Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LED (light emitting diode) displays, LED (light emitting diode) panels for displaying video or images, electronic regulating and control devices for the operation of LEDs (light emitting diodes); Computer controls for lighting apparatus and instruments; control consoles for lighting; programmable controls for lighting; audio sensitive controls for lighting; lighting control software, namely, lighting control software for use in commercial and industrial facilities, in theaters, in night clubs and at concerts, lighting control software for use in stage lighting apparatus and instruments and for controlling stage lighting apparatus and instruments; electric cables, connectors and switches for stage lighting; image projectors for projection of patterns, images, logos, texts or shapes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |