USPTO serial 86517505
AMCS 3D DIALOGUE DISCUSSION DIATRIBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2015
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMCS 3D DIALOGUE DISCUSSION DIATRIBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Upland, CA, US
Upland, CA, US
Upland, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Huynh
David M. Huynh ESTELLE & KENNEDY367 N 2nd AvenueUPLAND, CA 91786-5177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational training services, namely, training in the field of protocols for addressing dialectical and transactional agency and mindfulness required for managing anger in variety of clinical, work, business, and school/academic settings; educational training services, namely, training in the field of mindfulness in order to identify where a person is located within the communication cycle, namely, diatribe meaning loss or anger, misrepresentation and bias, discussion such as framing the problem or concern, dialogue such as formulating a solution to any problem, and discourse such as participating in communication where there is mutual understanding about information being presented; educational training services, namely, a training protocol and program for recognizing what can be achieved with and in each component of communication cycle with application in variety of settings where anger and the management of anger, such as in courts, work place and schools, are important concerns; education method for achieving recognition of loss in the grieving cycle, namely, shock, bargaining meaning a review of past options missed, depression/sadness, anger, and recovery/resolution and one's own system of loss; educational services, namely, training in the field of a method for achieving recognition of awareness that anger, communicated as a diatribe, is always a reflection of one's system of loss, your and others, which might contain cognitive distortions that can lead to violence as a consequence of misrepresentation, and that not all problems can be solved immediately before it is properly framed and a solution presented; educational services, namely, training in the field of a method for achieving recognition of the importance of one's identity and agency to reflect upon and also to support the identity and agency of others, as well as the importance of establishing or reestablishing a routine to manage depression, which is an inevitable consequence of loss, and the awareness that solution to any problem whereby both parties are made whole, can only be reached by way of dialogue | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2022 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 22, 2022 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |