USPTO serial 86517706
COPTERSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COPTERSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodinville, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas G. Gallagher
DOUGLAS G. GALLAGHER Bingham Greenebaum Doll10 W Market St Ste 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204-4900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and parts and accessories therefor; aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles and parts and accessories therefor; prop guards for aerial vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles; propellers for aerial vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles; antennas for aerial vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles; batteries and battery chargers; camera mounts and supports; motorized camera mounts and supports; stabilized camera mounts and supports; cameras; video cameras; glasses for use with aerial vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles; first-person view smart glasses for use with aerial vehicles and unmanned aerial vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor; on-line retail store services featuring aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor; distributorship services in the field of aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor; advertising and marketing services, namely, promoting the goods of others, including aerial vehicles, unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Upgrading aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor; customizing aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor; repair of aerial vehicles, including unmanned remote aerial vehicles, and parts and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |