Drawing for CHAI THERE

USPTO serial 86519194

CHAI THERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHAI THERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kurt D. Olender

KURT D. OLENDER Olenderfeldman Llp422 Morris AveSummit, NJ 07901-1522UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Mixes for making chai teaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2018EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 15, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 10, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 10, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 23, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 24, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2016NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2016TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 25, 2016PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2016PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 19, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2015NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2015NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance